In the months since the Google Book Search settlement was announced, there has been a lot of commentary, criticism, and debate about it. If you’d like to read more about the controversy, below is a collection of links to some interesting articles, essays, and blog posts. (Here’s my original October 28, 2008 post on the subject right after the settlement was announced. My initial reaction was very positive, but I do have some concerns and opinions which I’ll save for a future post. )
New York Times articles:
April 4, 2009 article, “Google’s plan for out-of-print books is challenged.”
February 1, 2009 article, “Some fear Google’s power in digital books.”
January 4, 2009 article, “Google hopes to open a trove of little-seen books.”
October 28, 2008 article, “Google settles suit over book-scanning.”
Commentary and criticism:
Walt Crawford’s “Perspective: The Google Books Settlement,” a 30-page analysis and summary of commentary by others in the March 2009 Cites & Insights newsletter.
Robert Darnton’s “Google & the Future of Books” in the New York Review of Books (February 12, 2009), and letters in response to Darnton’s essay.
Jonathan Grimmelmann’s “How to Fix the Google Book Search Settlement” in the April 2009 Journal of Internet Law.
Electronic Frontier Foundation’s “Reader’s Guide to the Google Book Search Settlement.”
Jonathan Band’s “A Guide for the Perplexed: Libraries and the Google Library Project Settlement” (November 2008).
Charlie Petit’s commentary on his Scrivner’s Error blog.
In March 2009 a conference was held at Columbia Law School called “The Google Books Settlement: What Will it Mean for the Long Term?” The blog Open Access News has a summary of blog comments about the conference. More on the conference from the LibraryLaw Blog (part 1 and part 2).
If you have any link suggestions or opinions you’d like to share, please do so in the comments to this post.